Key result
Low molecular weight heparin is safe and effective for the outpatient management of acute deep vein thrombosis, offering net cost savings compared to unfractionated heparin.
Why the study?
Does Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) improve safety and efficacy compared to unfractionated heparin or warfarin in patients with venous thrombosis?
Does Low Molecular Weight Heparin (LMWH) improve safety and efficacy compared to unfractionated heparin or warfarin in patients with venous thrombosis?
LMWH is a safe, effective, and cost-saving alternative to unfractionated heparin for outpatient DVT management, though its role in secondary prevention requires further study.
Supports outpatient DVT management shift; leaves open secondary prevention role pending further study.
LMWH preparations have been proven to be safe and effective in the out-patient management of acute DVT. Although LMWHs are more expensive than unfractionated heparin, the lack of need for laboratory monitoring of LMWHs and their potential for out-patient treatment more than offsets the drug related cost difference and results in a net cost savings in favour of LMWH. LMWHs have undergone limited investigation for the secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism after an initial in-patient course of unfractionated heparin. To data, LMWHs have been given in prophylactic doses in these trials. In this setting, the LMWHs are associated with a similar risk of bleeding as fixed, intermediate dose unfractionated heparin in patients with a high risk of bleeding. In patients with no increase in bleeding risk, fixed prophylactic dose LMWH appears to be associated with both a lower risk of bleeding than warfarin (target INR of 2.0 to 3.0) and an increased risk of recurrence, although these findings need to be confirmed in larger trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hirsh et al. (1997) conducted a review in Venous thrombosis. Low Molecular Weight Heparin vs. Unfractionated heparin and warfarin was evaluated. Low molecular weight heparin is safe and effective for the outpatient management of acute deep vein thrombosis, offering net cost savings compared to unfractionated heparin.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: