Ultraviolet/visible (UV/vis) spectroscopy was used to determine qualitatively and quantitatively Cu2+, Co2+, Co3+, and Fe3+ in oxidized Cu–Co ore leachates. The mineralogical and chemical characteristics of the three oxidized Cu–Co ore samples considered were determined using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), X-ray powder diffractometry (XRD), scanning electron microscopy-energy dispersive spectroscopy (SEM-EDS), and X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF). The results showed that Cu and Co in the samples were in the form of carrollite (Co2CuS4), malachite (Cu2CO3(OH)2, and heterogenite (CoO(OH)). The samples contained (2.73% Cu and 0.19% Co), (2.82% Cu and 0.07% Co), and (0.03% Cu and 0.05% Co), respectively. Gangues were mainly constituted of quartz, goethite, and hematite. The ultraviolet/visible (UV/vis) results indicated that the wavelengths of absorbance of the metal ions in dilute ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid aqueous solution (pH ≈ 3.5) were Fe3+ (293 nm), Cu2+ (821 nm), Co3+ (344 nm), and Co2+ (512 nm). The molar concentrations of the metal ions obtained using the UV/vis method compared well with the results obtained using the atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) method. UV/vis spectroscopy was also used to monitor the conversion of Co3+ into Co2+ using different reducing agents. The results showed that the molar concentration of Co2+ in the aqueous solutions increased with the addition of reducing agents, of about 80.95% (copper foil), 61.22% (ferrous sulfate), and 20.35% (sodium sulfite), respectively.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kime et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: