Key result
Transcranial Doppler recording within 1 month of the last ischemic event strongly predicted the detection of microembolic signals (OR 13.5; 95% CI 3.3-54.3).
Why the study?
What are the clinical predictors of microembolic signals in patients with ischemic stroke or TIA associated with cardiac emboligenic conditions?
Observational (n=104)
What are the clinical predictors of microembolic signals in patients with ischemic stroke or TIA associated with cardiac emboligenic conditions?
Odds Ratio: 13.5 (95% CI 3.3–54.3)
Microembolic signals are most strongly predicted by recent and multiple cerebral events, suggesting TCD monitoring may have potential utility in guiding antithrombotic therapy in acute cardioembolic stroke.
TCD timing within 1 month post-ischemia was associated with microembolic signals; leaves open whether monitoring can guide antithrombotic therapy in cardioembolic stroke.
The clinical predictors and potential therapeutic implications of microembolic signals (MES) were investigated in 104 patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack associated with high-risk (n = 60) or low-risk (n = 44) cardiac emboligenic conditions. Patients with artificial valves and carotid stenosis were excluded. MES counts were based on 30-min bilateral middle cerebral artery transcranial Doppler (TCD) monitoring recordings. MES were detected in 15 subjects (14%). The mean number of MES per hour was 1.9. MES prevalence and counts were influenced neither by age, gender or type of cerebral event, nor by cardiac disease. MES were more frequently detected and greater in number in patients with multiple cerebral ischemic events and in subjects monitored within 1 month of the last event. By multiple logistic regression, TCD recording within 1 month of the last event [Odds ratio (OD) = 13.5; 95% confidence intervals (CI) = 3.3-54.3] and multiple cerebral events (OD = 4.7; 95% CI = 1.3-17.3) were the best MES predictors. MES were detected in 40% (4/10) of patients on heparin, 5% (2/4) of untreated subjects and 13% (5/39) of those on antiplatelet drugs. For patients on warfarin, MES counts and prevalence were similar in subjects with international normalized ratios (INR) below and within/above the therapeutic range. MES were detected in only 2 out of 16 subjects with INR <2 and in 1 with INR >2. MES detection can be potentially relevant to the selection of antithrombotic treatment in acute stroke associated with cardioembolic disease, but further studies are necessary to assess its effectiveness as an additional guide to monitor oral anticoagulant intensity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Batista et al. (1999) conducted an observational in Ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (n=104). Transcranial Doppler recording within 1 month of the last event vs. Transcranial Doppler recording >1 month after the last event was evaluated on Detection of microembolic signals (MES) (OR 13.5, 95% CI 3.3-54.3). Transcranial Doppler recording within 1 month of the last ischemic event strongly predicted the detection of microembolic signals (OR 13.5; 95% CI 3.3-54.3).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: