Key result
The Latarjet procedure and Eden Hybinette free iliac graft showed no significant clinical or radiographic differences for recurrent shoulder dislocation with bone loss (P>0.05).
Why the study?
Optimal management for recurrent traumatic anterior glenohumeral instability remains debated, and this study aimed to evaluate functional outcomes of the Latarjet procedure versus free tricortical iliac graft in patients with recurrent dislocation and bone loss.
Does the Latarjet procedure improve functional outcomes compared to free iliac graft in adult patients with recurrent shoulder dislocation and bone loss?
RCT (n=40)
random
Does the Latarjet procedure improve functional outcomes compared to free iliac graft in adult patients with recurrent shoulder dislocation and bone loss?
p-value: p=>0.05
Both Latarjet and Eden Hybinette are effective for regaining shoulder stability in patients with bone loss, though Eden Hybinette may result in better range of motion.
Equivalent stability with Latarjet showing reduced ROM; supports either approach and extends comparative RCT data in shoulder instability.
Background: Over the last couple of decades, there has been much discussion on how best to manage patients with recurrent traumatic anterior glenohumeral instability. When dealing with bone loss due to repeated shoulder dislocation, Latarjet and Eden Hybinette are both excellent treatment options. In instances of recurrent shoulder dislocation with glenoid bone loss or Hill Sachs lesion of the humeral head, the goal of this study is to evaluate the functional outcomes of Latarjet against free tricortical iliac graft.Cases and procedures: Forty adult patients with repeated shoulder dislocations and bone loss participated in this prospective randomised controlled trial (RCT). Two groups of patients were selected at random. (twenty cases of Eden Hybinette and twenty handles for Latarjet aircraft). We compared the outcomes radiographically using CT after at least six months and clinically using the modified Rowe score. Potential side effects in both groups were also recorded. No clinically or radiographically significant differences were seen between the groups (P >.05). Latarjet group had significantly reduced ROM (particularly internal and exterior rotation) at the last follow-up (P.05). Tramadol caused repeated dislocation in one patient in the latarjet group. Two people in each set had solely frontal lobe anxiety. Ten percent of patients in the Eden group had donor-site sensory problems. On CT, the grafts in the iliac group seemed bigger. In conclusion, Latarjet and Eden Hybinette are two competing methods for regaining bone-loss-related shoulder stability.better ROM.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nasr-Eldin et al. (2023) conducted an RCT in recurrent shoulder dislocation with bone loss (n=40). Latarjet procedure vs. Eden Hybinette (free tricortical iliac graft) was evaluated on clinical and radiographic outcomes (modified Rowe score and CT) (p=>0.05). The Latarjet procedure and Eden Hybinette free iliac graft showed no significant clinical or radiographic differences for recurrent shoulder dislocation with bone loss (P>0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: