Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective: To assess the flexural strength (FS) of protocol bars on implants made of polyether ether ketone (PEEK) and metal. Methods: Thirty PEEK bars and thirty metal bars (control) were manufactured in three different cross-sectional designs (n = 10): rectangular solid bar (R); T-shaped bar (T); and inverted-T shaped bar (T-inv). The 30 cm bars were screwed onto Cone Morse implants measuring 3.75 x 11.0 mm and subjected to FS test on a universal testing machine (0.5 mm/min), with load applied to the pontic. Then, the counter-torque (CTorque) was measured on the screws following the test. Results: Both the PEEK and metal bars showed the highest FS values for the R-type design, followed by the T and T-inv designs. On average, FS values of PEEK bars for the T and T-inv designs were, respectively, 32.5% and 47.2% smaller than the R-shaped bars. On metal bars, the T and T-inv designs showed values 19.9% and 30.5% smaller than that found for the R design. However, regardless of design, the Ni-Cr bars showed consistently higher FS values. CTorque was not affected by material, but the R design showed higher values. Conclusion: The bar design influences FS. Regardless of design, metal bars show higher FS relative to PEEK. On the other hand, CTorque was not affected by material; in terms of design, the R-shaped bars showed lowest CTorque and T and T-inv showed no statistical difference.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Franco et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: