Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Double-blind crossover trial reveals that pre-exercise caffeine increases post-exercise torque loss in healthy men, indicating that higher eccentric loading can exacerbate muscle damage.
Purpose: This study examined the impact of pre-exercise caffeine supplementation on post-exercise torque reduction, an indirect marker of exercise-induced muscle damage (EIMD), while focusing on the changes in eccentric load induced by the ergogenic effects of caffeine. Methods: In double-blind, crossover trials, 15 healthy young men ingested 6 mg/kg caffeine or placebo, followed by an eccentric exercise task at 30–120° of knee extension: 100 isokinetic eccentric maximal voluntary knee extensions in Study 1 ( i.e. , variable eccentric load by caffeine) and 100 isoload (fixed at 120% of concentric one-repetition maximum) eccentric leg extensions in Study 2 ( i.e. , invariable eccentric load by caffeine). Maximal voluntary isometric torque (MVIT) of the knee extensors, an indirect EIMD marker, was evaluated at 24 and 48 h after exercise. Results: In Study 1, caffeine supplementation resulted in higher eccentric torques during exercise ( P ≤ 0.001), but lower post-exercise MVITs ( P < 0.001) than placebo. Conversely, in Study 2, there were no significant differences in post-exercise MVITs between the conditions ( P = 0.242). In Study 1, post-exercise MVITs were negatively correlated with the total torque–time integral ( r rm = -0.53; P = 0.034). Conclusions: Pre-exercise caffeine supplementation induces greater exercise-induced torque reduction during the 48-h post-exercise period after eccentric exercise, potentially suggesting greater EIMD. Additionally, increased eccentric load in accordance with caffeine’s ergogenic effect may contribute to this greater post-exercise torque-reduction. Therefore, the potential impact on post-exercise muscle function should be considered when caffeine is used as a preworkout supplement for resistance exercise.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matsumura et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: