Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The increasing number of hip and knee arthroplasties implies a greater likelihood of periprosthetic fractures and need for successful treatment options. We asked whether in situ effective lengthening of the indwelling prosthesis by a custom-made slotted hollow intramedullary nail provided a reasonable alternative to the established internal fixation techniques and prosthesis exchange. Between 1994 and 2005, we treated 25 patients (four male and 21 female; average age, 80 years) with a hip or knee periprosthetic fracture using this technique. Preconditions included a well-fixed prosthesis with a conical tip. In 23 hip cases a retrograde femur nail and in two knee fracture cases an antegrade nail were used for in situ lengthening of a femoral hip or knee implant stem. In all 25 cases, we used a preoperatively manufactured custom-made implant; in 20 patients, we recommended immediate mobilization by partial or full weightbearing. Eighteen of 25 patients were followed a minimum of 7 months (mean, 25 months; range, 7-31 months). Three patients died and four were lost to followup. We observed fracture healing in all patients, but one female patient had subsequent prosthesis loosening. The major complication rate was 6% (one of 18). We believe effective lengthening of the indwelling prosthesis by a custom-made slotted hollow intramedullary nail is a reasonable option for treating periprosthetic femoral fractures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meyer et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: