Key result
Conduit phase left atrial strain and strain rate were significantly reduced in grade 1 LVDD compared to no LVDD, providing a marker for early detection of LVDD (AUC 0.707 and 0.742, respectively).
Why the study?
The degree of left atrial strain and strain rate reduction across different stages of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in older subjects with preserved ejection fraction was not fully clarified.
Are left atrial strain and strain rate parameters associated with the severity of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in older patients with preserved ejection fraction?
Observational (n=153)
Are left atrial strain and strain rate parameters associated with the severity of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in older patients with preserved ejection fraction?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.707
p-value: p=<0.001
Reduction in left atrial conduit strain and strain rate may serve as an early echocardiographic marker of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in older adults with preserved ejection fraction.
May aid LVDD staging in elderly patients with preserved EF; leaves open whether it improves risk stratification or alters management.
Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Left atrial (LA) functional abnormalities, including LA strain (LAS) and strain rate (LASR) reduction, are observed in patients with left ventricular diastolic disfunction (LVDD). However, the degree of reduction at different stages of LVDD is not fully clarified. We aimed to assess the interdependence between LAS and LASR parameters and LVDD grades in subjects of advanced age with preserved ejection fraction (EF). Material and methods Consecutive patients, who underwent echocardiography within 12 months, were screened and included into the study in case of age older than 65 years, preserved EF, sinus rhythm at the time of study and preserved dataset of sufficient quality for speckle tracking analysis. LAS and LASR parameters, including LAS and peak LASR during reservoir, conduit, and contractile phases were calulated with single plane apical 4-chamber view assessment. One-way ANOVA analysis with Bonferroni correction was used to assess the difference between groups. Results Among 153 patients (mean age 74 ± 7 years; 105 female, mean EF 64 ± 5%) included in the study there were 38 patients with no evidence of LVDD, 67 with LVDD grade 1, 40 with LVDD grade 2, and 5 with LVDD grade 3. The values of LAS and LASR parameters for these groups are summarized in Table. All parameters were significantly reduced in grade 2 and 3 LVDD patients comparing to the patients with no LVDD. Contractile phase LAS and LASR were slightly higher in grade 1 than in no LVDD patients. Reservoir and conduit phase LAS and LASR were lower in grade 1 LVDD comparing to no LVDD, but only for conduit phase parameters the difference was significant. In ROC analysis for conduit phase LAS and LASR to be associated with the presence of LVDD of any grade the area under the curve was 0,707 (p < 0.001) and 0,742 (p < 0.001) respectively. Conclusion Impaired LA function is seen in patients with LVDD. Whereas measurements characterizing LA reservoir and contractile functions demonstrate significant decrease at advanced stages of LVDD, conduit function is significantly reduced at grade 1 LVDD, providing the possibility for early detection of LVDD. Group LAS (%) LASR (1/sec) reservoir conduit contractile reservoir conduit contractile No LVDD, n = 38 29,7 ± 9,3 †‡ 15,1 ± 6,6 §†‡ 14,6 ± 5,4 †‡ 1,28 ± 0,37 †‡ 1,18 ± 0,44 §† 1,68 ± 0,60 †‡ Grade 1, n = 69 28,6 ± 8,9 †‡ 11,6 ± 6,2 ƒ 17,0 ± 5,7 †‡ 1,23 ± 0,43 ‡ 0,90 ± 0,38 ƒ 1,99 ± 0,71 †‡ Grade 2, n = 40 19,1 ± 7,1 ƒ§ 9,2 ± 4,5 ƒ 9,9 ± 4,4 ƒ§ 0,87 ± 0,26 ƒ§ 0,72 ± 0,27 ƒ 1,07 ± 0,44 ƒ§ Garde 3, n = 5 13,8 ± 3,6 ƒ§ 7,7 ± 2,5 ƒ 6,1 ± 2,2 ƒ§ 0,8 ± 0,29 ƒ 0,75 ± 0,28 0,67 ± 0,27 ƒ§ Significant difference (p < 0,05): ƒ – with No LVDD, § – with Grade 1 LVDD, † – with Grade 2 LVDD, ‡ – with Grade 3 LVDD
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Савельев et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) (n=153). Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (LVDD) vs. No LVDD was evaluated on Presence of LVDD of any grade associated with conduit phase left atrial strain (LAS) (AUC 0.707, p=<0.001). Conduit phase left atrial strain and strain rate were significantly reduced in grade 1 LVDD compared to no LVDD, providing a marker for early detection of LVDD (AUC 0.707 and 0.742, respectively).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: