Measurements were made of the perceived contrast that results from the Cornsweet illusion as a function of the edge contrast and edge width. The physical contrast was varied from 3% to 5%, and the visual extent of the Cornsweet edge varied from 0.1 degrees to 3.0 degrees on each side. Results show that, for low-contrast (less than 20%) and wide edges, the Cornsweet edge yields as much contrast as a real-step lumininance transition with the same edge magnitude. At high contrast (30%-40%) the illusion is reduced relative to a real step, regardless of whether the illusion consists of a conventional Cornsweet edge or an additive combination of a real step and a Cornsweet edge. As a general rule, wide edges yield more contrast than narrow edges. The results are interpreted in terms of the visual describing funtion; a nonlinear model is proposed. The correspondence between the predictions of the model and the perceptual measurements on the Cornsweet edges is good.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dooley et al. (1977) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: