Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) rely heavily on perception systems to understand their operational environment. However, prevailing AI-driven perception algorithms are prone to errors that may propagate through downstream motion planning and control systems, potentially causing safety risks. This paper investigates a critical yet under-explored pattern of perception errors: misdetection, where the perception system intermittently loses track of objects in the environment. Through a car-following case study, we demonstrate that misdetection poses unique challenges due to its intermittent, nonlinear effects. We identify a safety-critical detection-rate threshold, below which collision risk increases sharply. This effect is particularly pronounced for conventional controllers that account for measurement noise but neglect misdetections, leading to unstable decision-making and jerky vehicle motion. To address these challenges, we propose a Misdetection-Aware MPC (MA-MPC) framework that accounts for both misdetections and measurement noise in its chance constraints. This framework employs a Perception Error Model (PEM) to model both types of errors and introduces a novel uncertainty propagation mechanism to predict future perceptual and motion uncertainties of the leading vehicle. Simulation results show that MA-MPC greatly improves safety, reducing collision risk by over 66% relative to noise-only control, while maintaining smooth vehicle motion during nominal cruising. Our work bridges the critical gap between perception uncertainty and safe control, offering a unified methodology to enhance AV reliability in driving scenarios with imperfect perception systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: