Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The cost-benefits of a central intake intervention for substance abuse treatment referrals were demonstrated using a transaction cost analysis on two cohorts of participants during the three-year initiative. Costs for clients receiving central intake services were compared with those just prior to the intervention's implementation. In order to study the relationship between substance abuse treatment costs and avoided criminal justice costs, data from three administrative data sets were used. Results indicate that clients receiving the central intake intervention had approximately a 58 percent decrease in costs compared to clients not receiving the intervention. The initiative produced opportunity cost savings to treatment, court, and correctional systems, with completion being crucial to opportunity cost savings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Finigan et al. (2006) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: