Key result
The CREST model predicted circulatory-etiology death immediately after successful resuscitation in patients without STEMI, achieving an area under the curve of 0.68 in the validation cohort.
Why the study?
Does the CREST model accurately predict circulatory-etiology death in patients without ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction after cardiac arrest?
Cohort
Yes
Does the CREST model accurately predict circulatory-etiology death in patients without ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction after cardiac arrest?
The CREST model is a validated tool that can rapidly stratify the risk of circulatory-etiology death in cardiac arrest survivors without STEMI, facilitating individualized triage.
May aid post-arrest triage decisions; leaves open prospective validation and outcome impact before clinical use.
BACKGROUND: No practical tool quantitates the risk of circulatory-etiology death (CED) immediately after successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation in patients without ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. We developed and validated a prediction model to rapidly determine that risk and facilitate triage to individualized treatment pathways. METHODS: With the use of INTCAR (International Cardiac Arrest Registry), an 87-question data set representing 44 centers in the United States and Europe, patients were classified as having had CED or a combined end point of neurological-etiology death or survival. Demographics and clinical factors were modeled in a derivation cohort, and backward stepwise logistic regression was used to identify factors independently associated with CED. We demonstrated model performance using area under the curve and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test in the derivation and validation cohorts, and assigned a simplified point-scoring system. RESULTS: =0.002), shock at presentation (OR, 2.27; CI, 1.42-3.62; P<0.001), and ischemic time >25 minutes (OR, 1.42; CI, 0.90-2.23; P=0.13). The derivation model area under the curve was 0.73, and Hosmer-Lemeshow test P=0.47. Outcomes were similar in the 318-patient validation cohort (area under the curve 0.68, Hosmer-Lemeshow test P=0.41). When assigned a point for each associated factor in the derivation model, the average predicted versus observed probability of CED with a CREST score (coronary artery disease, initial heart rhythm, low ejection fraction, shock at the time of admission, and ischemic time >25 minutes) of 0 to 5 was: 7.1% versus 10.2%, 9.5% versus 11%, 22.5% versus 19.6%, 32.4% versus 29.6%, 38.5% versus 30%, and 55.7% versus 50%. CONCLUSIONS: The CREST model stratified patients immediately after resuscitation according to risk of a circulatory-etiology death. The tool may allow for estimation of circulatory risk and improve the triage of survivors of cardiac arrest without ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction at the point of care.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bascom et al. (2017) conducted a cohort in Cardiac arrest without ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. CREST model was evaluated on Circulatory-etiology death (CED). The CREST model predicted circulatory-etiology death immediately after successful resuscitation in patients without STEMI, achieving an area under the curve of 0.68 in the validation cohort.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: