Key result
Carriers of putative pathogenic rare variants had a 10.9 ms longer QTc than noncarriers, and polygenic risk was also significantly associated with QTc duration (1.4 ms increase per PRS decile).
Why the study?
Clinical genetic testing for unexplained QT prolongation is restricted to monogenic rare variants, leaving the joint contribution of rare and common polygenic variations in the population unexamined.
Does polygenic risk and monogenic rare variation influence QTc interval duration in the general population?
Population
84 630 UK Biobank participants and 26 976 TOPMed participants with whole-genome sequencing and ECG data
Comparison
PRS deciles and carriers vs noncarriers of putative pathogenic rare variants in 10 genes
Design
Genome-wide association study and observational cohort analysis
Authors
Loading...
Should not yet alter QTc risk assessment; leaves open whether rare variants and PRS improve arrhythmia prediction.
Observational (n=111,606)
Yes
Does polygenic risk and monogenic rare variation influence QTc interval duration in the general population?
Mean Difference: 10.9 (95% CI 7.4–14.4)
p-value: p=1.1x10-9
QTc duration in the general population is significantly influenced by both rare monogenic variants and common polygenic risk, suggesting comprehensive genetic assessment should incorporate both.
Nauffal et al. (2022) conducted an observational in QTc prolongation (n=111,606). Monogenic rare variants and polygenic risk score vs. Noncarriers and lower polygenic risk was evaluated on QTc interval duration (MD 10.9 ms, 95% CI 7.4-14.4, p=1.1x10-9). Carriers of putative pathogenic rare variants had a 10.9 ms longer QTc than noncarriers, and polygenic risk was also significantly associated with QTc duration (1.4 ms increase per PRS decile).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: