Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
There is much interest in assessing the relative importance of “top-down” (from the trophic level above) vs. “bottom-up” (from the trophic level below) effects in ecological communities. This study compares the strength of top-down effects of parasites and bottom-up effects of plants on herbivores. We established populations of sea-oxeye daisy, Borrichia frutescens, and gall-making flies, Asphondylia borrichiae, on 12 separate off-shore islands in Pinellas County, Florida (USA). High levels of parasitism were obtained by adding high densities of parasitized galls, and high levels of host-plant nitrogen were obtained by adding fertilizer. We established three replicates of each of the following treatments: low parasitism, low nitrogen; low parasitism, high nitrogen; high parasitism, low nitrogen; and high parasitism, high nitrogen. There was a significant interaction of parasitism and plant nitrogen: parasitism was important only on high-nitrogen plants where galls were abundant. Thus, our results contribute new insights into top-down vs. bottom-up effects: bottom-up forces set the stage on which top-down forces may act.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stiling et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: