Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper presents some exact solutions, for the static bending behavior of higher-order shear elastic nanobeams using the nonlocal differential constitutive relation of Eringen, and under various boundary conditions. The nonlocal higher-order shear beam referred as a Bickford-Reddy’s beam model, assumes a cubic interpolation field for the displacement along the cross section, associated with a parabolic shear strain measure. The governing equations and boundary conditions are derived using the principle of virtual displacements. The nonlocality is applied to the generalized higher-order shear constitutive law, which is formulated in term of shear force, bending moment and higher-order moment. Subsequently, it is shown that the governing equations can be reduced to a single linear sixth-order differential equation for the transverse deflection, which can be solved using exact methods, for general boundary conditions. The present approach generalizes the results derived by Reddy [Citation1] for the static bending of a simply supported nonlocal higher-order shear beams under uniform distributed loading. Furthermore, we conduct an in-depth investigation to quantify the effects of the nonlocal parameter and the length-to-thickness ratio of the nanobeam on its bending response, for various boundary conditions, including the simply-supported, clamped and free boundary conditions at each end. Comparative studies demonstrate that our results not only cover the case of nonlocal higher-order shear beam theories, but can degenerate asymptotically into nonlocal Euler–Bernoulli beam theory, and nonlocal Timoshenko beam theory, which are better documented for the aforementioned boundary conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Challamel et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: