Key result
The live attenuated EV-A71/CV-A16 combination vaccine was safe, causing no notable pathological changes, and triggered a dual specific immune response in rhesus monkeys.
Why the study?
Enterovirus 71 and Coxsackievirus A16 are the two most common pathogens causing hand, foot, and mouth disease, prompting evaluation of a combined live vaccine generated from candidate attenuated strains.
Does a live combination vaccine against EV-A71 and CV-A16 improve safety and immunogenicity compared to monovalent vaccines in rhesus monkeys?
Does a live combination vaccine against EV-A71 and CV-A16 improve safety and immunogenicity compared to monovalent vaccines in rhesus monkeys?
A live combination vaccine against EV-A71 and CV-A16 is safe and immunogenic in rhesus monkeys, attenuating histopathological lesions seen with monovalent vaccines.
Animal data support advancing bivalent live EV-A71/CV-A16 vaccine to trials; leaves open human safety and efficacy.
Enterovirus 71 (EV-A71) and Coxsackievirus A16 (CV-A16) are the two most common pathogens causing hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD). Previously, we obtained one candidate live attenuated strain each for EV-A71 and CV-A16; here, we evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of a combinedlive vaccine against EV-A71 and CV-A16 generated from these two candidate strains. Rhesus monkeys were intramuscularly treated with a live combinationvaccine against both EV-A71 and CV-A16 or with either vaccine alone. No fever or atypical clinical signs were observed in any animals. Monkeys vaccinated with the combinationlive vaccine presented no notable pathological changes in the brain, spinal cord, lung, and liver; in contrast, these regions showed inflammatory cell infiltration in monkeys treated with EV-A71 alone or CV-A16 alone. Weak viremia was detected in plasma after inoculation with the combinationvaccine; however, the duration of viral shedding in feces was increased. Biochemical studies revealed a slight increase in aspartate aminotransferase levels in monkeys inoculated with the live combination vaccine; however, histopathological findings did not attribute this change to liver damage. We also found that the live combinationvaccine induced a dual humoral immune response. Cytokine analysis indicated that the combined EV-A71/CV-A16 vaccine significantly down-regulated interleukin-8 production. Here, we have demonstrated that the live attenuated EV-A71/CV-A16 vaccine was safe and could trigger a dual specific immune response. However, its immune protection efficacy requires further investigation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2020) studied Hand, foot, and mouth disease (HFMD) (n=6). Live combination vaccine against EV-A71 and CV-A16 vs. Monovalent EV-A71 or CV-A16 vaccines was evaluated on Safety (clinical signs, histopathology) and immunogenicity (neutralizing antibodies). The live attenuated EV-A71/CV-A16 combination vaccine was safe, causing no notable pathological changes, and triggered a dual specific immune response in rhesus monkeys.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: