Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
March 29, 2004International Endodontic Journal

Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel–titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

ESEdgar SchäferMVM. Vlassis

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Overview

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Schäfer et al. (2004) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6aa01b735e47f483ebbac0dbhttps://doi.org/10.1111/j.0143-2885.2004.00783.x
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The penetration of root canal sealers into dentinai tubules. A scanning electron microscopic study1993 · 157 citations
  2. 2A comparative study of root canal preparation with HERO 642 and Quantec SC rotary Ni–Ti instruments2001 · 155 citations
  3. 3Shaping ability of ProFile.04 Taper <i>Series 29</i> rotary nickel‐titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 11997 · 160 citations
  4. 4Shaping ability of Quantec Series 2000 rotary nickel‐titanium instruments in simulated root canals: Part 11998 · 63 citations