Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The calibration of a neutron-sensitive device can range from a simple calibration factor at a single energy or energy distribution to a full response characterization over the entire energy range to which the device is sensitive. As the responses of neutron-sensitive devices and the fluence-to-dose-equivalent conversion coefficients can vary with neutron energy and incident angle, both simulation and experiments in standard neutron fields are required. Although several ISO standards present calibration principles in general and detailed discussion on many specific areas, there are certain omissions and limitations that this paper intends to highlight, along with some new recommendations derived from the recent literature, mainly focused on the effective centre, corrections for geometry and neutron scattering, as well as the problem of calibrating in terms of personal dose equivalent.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gressier et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: