Key result
Right ventricular outflow tract fractional shortening of less than 32% was 93% sensitive and 98% specific for identifying patients with impaired right ventricular function.
Why the study?
Can echocardiographic right ventricular outflow tract fractional shortening (RVOT FS) and systolic excursion (RVOT SE) accurately assess right ventricular function?
Case-Control (n=90)
No
Can echocardiographic right ventricular outflow tract fractional shortening (RVOT FS) and systolic excursion (RVOT SE) accurately assess right ventricular function?
Absolute Event Rate: 21.17% vs 48.9%
p-value: p=<0.001
RVOT FS is a simple, noninvasive echocardiographic parameter that accurately identifies right ventricular systolic dysfunction, whereas RVOT SE is less accurate.
May enhance echocardiographic RV assessment; observational data leave open need for prospective validation before practice change.
BACKGROUND: Echocardiographic right ventricular (RV) function assessment is difficult and still a gray area despite rapid advancement of imaging modalities. The aim of this study is to assess the role of echocardiographic RV outflow tract (RVOT) function in the form of RVOT fractional shortening (RVOT FS) and RVOT systolic excursion (RVOT SE) for the assessment of RV function. METHODS: We studied ninety individuals divided equally into two groups. The control group included 45 normal healthy individuals and age-matched patient group included 45 patients with RV dysfunction which was defined by tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) <16 mm and RV fractional area change (RV FAC) ≤35%. Echocardiography was performed to measure RVOT FS and RVOT SE and correlate them with other parameters of RV function including TAPSE, RV FAC, peak systolic velocity of the lateral tricuspid annulus (S') using pulsed tissue Doppler, and pulmonary acceleration time (PAcT). RESULTS: = 0.042). RVOT FS <32% was 93% sensitive and 98% specific to identify patients with impaired RV function. However, RVOT SE showed weak correlation with echocardiographic RV parameters. RVOT SE <5 mm was 80% sensitive and 76% specific to identify patients with impaired RV function. CONCLUSION: RVOT FS is a simple valuable parameter that can be used for the assessment of RV function. However, RVOT SE is less accurate than RVOT FS in RV function assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Allam et al. (2017) conducted a case-control in Right ventricular dysfunction (n=90). Right ventricular outflow tract fractional shortening (RVOT FS) vs. Healthy controls with normal right ventricular function was evaluated on Right ventricular outflow tract fractional shortening (RVOT FS) (p=<0.001). Right ventricular outflow tract fractional shortening of less than 32% was 93% sensitive and 98% specific for identifying patients with impaired right ventricular function.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: