This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
This study investigates the use of university technology transfer reporting standards developed under the aegis of the US-based Association of University Technology Managers (AUTM) in Canada. Given the importance to policy-makers internationally of improving the contributions of universities in transferring technology to industry, these indicators are regarded as critical to informing the policy debate. We analyze federal science and technology policy and identify how these metrics have influenced the framing of policy problems and alternatives. Next, a micro-level analysis of Canada’s largest research university unveils several major weaknesses of the survey. Our study points to the need for a more critical use of the AUTM licensing data in the Canadian policy debate, and provides recommendations on the future development of these indicators and their use in public policy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sigurdson et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: