In this study the Oxoid Aura image antibiotic sensitivity test system, used as a stand-alone device, was compared with manual zone measurement and use of a template, for the determination of sensitivities. An overall correlation coefficient of 0.99 was observed for zone diameters measured using the Aura image system and zones measured manually, when the differences between zones were within 3 mm; 5.4% of zones showed a difference in zone diameter between manual and automated measurement of >3 mm. The results obtained using the template method for interpretation were less reliable than zone measurement, with cefuroxime and ampicillin tested against Enterobacteriaceae and Acinetobacter spp. When linked to a laboratory patient database, the bar code and disc identification facilities avoided errors that were associated with manual data entry.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andrews et al. (2000) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: