Key result
Low socioeconomic status was associated with a higher risk of non-procedure-related hospital readmission and lower health-related quality of life 12 months after percutaneous coronary intervention.
Why the study?
Does low socioeconomic status worsen clinical outcomes and quality of life in patients undergoing PCI?
Observational (n=1,346)
Yes
Does low socioeconomic status worsen clinical outcomes and quality of life in patients undergoing PCI?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Low socioeconomic status is associated with worse quality of life and higher non-procedure-related readmissions after PCI, despite similar hard clinical outcomes.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether socioeconomic status (SES) influences clinical outcomes and quality of life after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Two interventional cardiac centres. PARTICIPANTS: 1346 consecutive patients undergoing PCI over a 12-month period. OUTCOMES: Self reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL; EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D); EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-VAS)), repeat angiography, revascularisation, hospital admission, myocardial infarction and death within 12 months, by SES derived using postal address code. MAIN RESULTS: No significant differences were found between patients with high and low SES in the occurrence of repeat angiography (p = 0.55), repeat revascularisation (PCI, p = 0.81, CAEG, p = 0.27), total cardiac hospitalisation (p = 0.10), myocardial infarction (p = 0.97) or death 12 months after PCI (p = 0.88). Non-procedure-related readmissions were higher in patients with low SES (18.6% v 13.7%; p = 0.025). After adjustment for confounding factors, patients with low SES had lower HRQoL scores at baseline (95% CI for difference 0.01 to 0.14; p = 0.003) and at 12 months (95% CI 0.07 to 0.17; p<0.001) compared with those with high SES. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical outcomes were similar for patients in different SES groups. Patients with low SES had considerably more non-procedure-related readmissions and lower quality-of-life scores. Future studies on HRQoL after coronary revascularisation should take account of these important differences related to SES.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Denvir et al. (2006) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (n=1,346). Low socioeconomic status vs. High socioeconomic status was evaluated on Non-procedure-related hospital readmission within 12 months (HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.05-1.83, p=0.025). Low socioeconomic status was associated with a higher risk of non-procedure-related hospital readmission and lower health-related quality of life 12 months after percutaneous coronary intervention.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: