Key result
Cochlear implantation under local anaesthesia is a safe and effective procedure for profoundly deaf adult patients at high risk for general anaesthesia, yielding comparable progress.
Why the study?
Does cochlear implantation under local anaesthesia provide safe and effective outcomes in profoundly deaf adults at high risk for general anaesthesia?
Observational
No
Does cochlear implantation under local anaesthesia provide safe and effective outcomes in profoundly deaf adults at high risk for general anaesthesia?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Cochlear implantation under local anaesthesia is a safe and effective alternative for profoundly deaf patients who are at high risk for general anaesthesia.
The profoundly deaf, who gain little or no benefit from conventional hearing aids and meet various criteria are potential candidates for cochlear implantation. The last two decades have witnessed remarkable progress in this field, and it is now a routine clinical procedure. A few adult patients who are potential candidates for cochlear implantation have an unacceptably high risk for hypotensive general anaesthesia due to other systemic conditions. This group has been successfully implanted under local anaesthesia in our centre. The post-implantation progress of these patients was comparable to those carried out under hypotensive general anaesthesia. Data regarding patient selection criteria, examination, anaesthesia, surgery and the outcome are discussed. It was concluded that cochlear implantation under local anaesthesia is a safe and effective procedure for those patients who otherwise may be denied an implant.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Toner et al. (1998) conducted an observational in Profound deafness. Cochlear implantation under local anaesthesia vs. Cochlear implantation under hypotensive general anaesthesia was evaluated on Post-implantation progress (safety and efficacy). Cochlear implantation under local anaesthesia is a safe and effective procedure for profoundly deaf adult patients at high risk for general anaesthesia, yielding comparable progress.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: