Key result
Pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation significantly increased muscle deoxyhemoglobin at steady-state compared to sham stimulation (67.58 vs 60.70 µM, p=0.049) during heavy constant-load cycling.
Why the study?
This study aimed to measure the acute effect of pulsed electromagnetic fields on muscle oxygenation and its influence on pulmonary oxygen kinetics during exercise.
Does active PEMF stimulation improve muscle oxygenation and pulmonary oxygen kinetics in male cyclists during constant-load exercise?
RCT (n=18)
Single-blind
Randomized
No
Does active PEMF stimulation improve muscle oxygenation and pulmonary oxygen kinetics in male cyclists during constant-load exercise?
Standardized Mean Difference: 0.17
Absolute Event Rate: 67.58% vs 60.7%
p-value: p=0.049
Local application of PEMF during cycling increases the rate of muscle O2 extraction and utilization but does not improve overall pulmonary oxygen kinetics or reduce blood lactate.
PEMFs may influence exercise oxygenation in athletes; hypothesis-generating and leaves open any clinical role pending larger trials.
Pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMFs) are used as non-invasive tools to enhance microcirculation and tissue oxygenation, with a modulatory influence on the microvasculature. This study aimed to measure the acute effect of PEMF on muscle oxygenation and its influence on pulmonary oxygen kinetics during exercise. Eighteen male cyclists performed, on different days, a constant-load exercise in both active (ON) and inactive (OFF) PEMF stimulations while deoxyhemoglobin and pulmonary oxygen kinetics, total oxygenation index, and blood lactate were collected. PEMF enhanced muscle oxygenation, with higher values of deoxyhemoglobin both at the primary component and at the steady-state level. Moreover, PEMF accelerated deoxyhemoglobin on-transition kinetic, with a shorter time delay, time constant, and mean response time than the OFF condition. Lactate concentration was higher during stimulation. No differences were found for total oxygenation index and pulmonary oxygen kinetics. Local application of a precise PEMF stimulation can increase the rate of the muscle O2 extraction and utilization. These changes were not accompanied by faster oxygen kinetics, reduced oxygen slow component, or reduced blood lactate level. It seems that oxygen consumption is more influenced by exercise involving large muscle mass like cycling, whereas PEMF might only act at the local level.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Trofè et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in Healthy male cyclists (n=18). Pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) stimulation vs. Inactive (OFF) PEMF stimulation was evaluated on Deoxyhemoglobin (HHb) at steady-state (ES 0.17, p=0.049). Pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation significantly increased muscle deoxyhemoglobin at steady-state compared to sham stimulation (67.58 vs 60.70 µM, p=0.049) during heavy constant-load cycling.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: