Key result
Treatment with investigational coronary devices (atherectomy, stents, lasers) achieved procedural success in 90.8% of patients, with a 4.0% rate of major complications.
Population
2,835 patients undergoing treatment with investigational coronary interventional devices across 36…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
In-hospital (median length of stay 4 days)
Authors
Loading...
Supports device feasibility in selected patients; leaves open randomized comparisons due to baseline differences.
Observational (n=2,835)
Yes
The NACI registry demonstrates high acute procedural success (90.8%) with new coronary interventional devices when used with adjunctive angioplasty, though baseline differences preclude direct device comparisons.
Baim et al. (1994) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease requiring intervention (n=2,835). Investigational coronary devices (atherectomy, stents, excimer lasers) was evaluated on Procedural success (lesion success in all new device-treated lesions without a major complication). Treatment with investigational coronary devices (atherectomy, stents, lasers) achieved procedural success in 90.8% of patients, with a 4.0% rate of major complications.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: