Key result
Laparoscopic liver resection under an ERAS protocol significantly reduced the odds of postoperative complications compared to open surgery in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (7% vs 26%, OR 0.22).
Why the study?
Although widely used in liver cancer surgery, clear indications for improving the ERAS protocol in open and laparoscopic liver resection are lacking.
Does the ERAS protocol improve postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma?
Cohort (n=89)
No
Does the ERAS protocol improve postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma?
Odds Ratio: 0.22 (95% CI 0.04–0.77)
Absolute Event Rate: 7% vs 26%
p-value: p=0.029
The ERAS protocol applied to laparoscopic nonanatomic liver resection for HCC is associated with low complication rates and shorter hospital stays.
Supports ERAS in laparoscopic nonanatomic LR for HCC; leaves open need for RCT confirmation.
Background: Liver resection (LR) remains the best therapeutic option for patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with preserved hepatic function and who are not eligible for liver transplantation. After its inception, the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol was widely used for treating patients with liver cancer, although there are still no clear indications for improving upon it in both open and laparoscopic surgery. Objective: This study aims to describe our institute's experience in the application of the ERAS protocol in a cohort of HCC patients, and to explore possible factors that could have an impact on postoperative outcomes. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed our experience with LR performed from September 2017 to January 2020 in patients treated with ERAS protocol, focusing on describing impact on postoperative nutrition, analgesic requirements, and length of hospitalization. Demographics, operative factors, and postoperative complications of patients were reviewed. Results: During the study period, 89 HCC patients were eligible for LR, and 75% of patients presented with liver cirrhosis. The most prevalent among etiologic factors was hepatitis C virus infection (53 patients out of 89, 60%), followed by nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (18 patients, 20%). The median age was 70 years. Liver cirrhosis did not have an impact on postoperative course of patients. Patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery and nonanatomic LR experienced low complication rates, shorter length of stay, and shorter time of intravenous analgesic requirements. Conclusions: Continual refinement with ERAS protocol for treating HCC patients based on perioperative counseling and surgical decision-making is crucial to guarantee low complication rates, and reduce patient morbidity and time for recovery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pagano et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Hepatocellular carcinoma (n=89). Laparoscopic liver resection vs. Open liver resection was evaluated on Any postoperative complication (OR 0.22, 95% CI 0.04-0.77, p=0.029). Laparoscopic liver resection under an ERAS protocol significantly reduced the odds of postoperative complications compared to open surgery in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (7% vs 26%, OR 0.22).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: