Key result
Preparticipation cardiovascular screening in young competitive athletes is recommended to identify potentially fatal disorders, despite controversies regarding efficacy and false-positive results.
Why the study?
Does preparticipation cardiovascular screening prevent sudden cardiac death in young competitive athletes?
Does preparticipation cardiovascular screening prevent sudden cardiac death in young competitive athletes?
This review highlights the ongoing controversies regarding the efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and false-positive rates of preparticipation cardiovascular screening in young athletes.
Reinforces screening recommendations for young athletes; leaves open resolution of efficacy and cost-effectiveness controversies with higher-quality trials.
The beneficial effects of regular physical exercise on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality are well documented. In rare cases, however, athletes with cardiovascular abnormalities are at increased risk of exercise-related sudden cardiac death (SCD). Paradoxically, most SCDs can be attributed to cardiovascular abnormalities that can be identified during an athlete's life. Such abnormalities can be minimized by several therapeutic strategies, including insertion of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. Based on these considerations, the medical and sporting governing bodies recommend preparticipation cardiovascular screening (PPS) in young competitive athletes (aged ≤ 35 years) to identify potentially fatal cardiovascular disorders. However, PPS is associated with several controversies related to the efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and impact of false-positive results. This article aims to provide a detailed overview of the issues concerning PPS based on current evidence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chandra et al. (2010) conducted a review in Cardiovascular disorders. Preparticipation cardiovascular screening (PPS) was evaluated. Preparticipation cardiovascular screening in young competitive athletes is recommended to identify potentially fatal disorders, despite controversies regarding efficacy and false-positive results.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: