Key result
Femoral torsion measurements differ based on the magnetic resonance imaging sequences used, highlighting the need to standardize hip-preservation research and clinical techniques.
Why the study?
Do femoral torsion measurements differ based on axial versus axial-oblique magnetic resonance imaging sequences in patients with femoroacetabular impingement?
Do femoral torsion measurements differ based on axial versus axial-oblique magnetic resonance imaging sequences in patients with femoroacetabular impingement?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Standardization of MRI sequences for measuring femoral torsion is needed to appropriately compare outcomes across hip preservation studies.
Femoral torsion is an important measure in patients with femoroacetabular impingement presenting with limited hip range of motion. However, femoral torsion may be measured using computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging and on axial or axial-oblique sequences. Recent research shows that femoral torsion measurements differ based on the magnetic resonance imaging sequences on which this parameter is measured. In some cases, this may be clinically relevant in the sense that a derotational femoral osteotomy may be considered when otherwise it would not be. As more research is published within the specialized field of hip preservation surgery, we must begin to standardize our research and clinical techniques such that outcomes may be appropriately compared across studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matthew J. Kraeutler (2022) conducted an editorial in Femoroacetabular impingement. Femoral torsion measurement (axial vs axial-oblique MRI sequences) was evaluated. Femoral torsion measurements differ based on the magnetic resonance imaging sequences used, highlighting the need to standardize hip-preservation research and clinical techniques.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: