Key result
Magnetic resonance imaging generally underestimates true femoral version compared to computed tomography, though 3-dimensional imaging may optimize both modalities.
Why the study?
Does MRI accurately measure femoral version compared to CT scan in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome?
Does MRI accurately measure femoral version compared to CT scan in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome?
While CT remains the gold standard for femoral version measurement, MRI is a viable alternative that avoids radiation, though it may underestimate version; 3D imaging could improve accuracy for both.
Hip arthroscopy has become increasingly popular in the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. Careful preoperative planning including evaluation of acetabular and femoral version is necessary to optimize outcomes. Increased femoral anteversion has been associated with microinstability, and conversely, decreased femoral version may predispose to impingement. Computed tomography (CT) is considered the gold standard for femoral version measurements and preoperative planning. However, with recent advancements in technology, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown comparable measurements to CT imaging. In terms of advantages and disadvantages, CT requires radiation, albeit "low dose." MRI has a longer acquisition time, and movement of the patient may affect image quality and subsequent accuracy. MRI generally underestimates true version, probably as a result of patient positioning. Three-dimensional imaging could resolve this issue and may become the gold standard for both CT and MRI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moran et al. (2024) conducted an editorial in femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. Magnetic Resonance Imaging vs. Computed tomography was evaluated on femoral version measurements. Magnetic resonance imaging generally underestimates true femoral version compared to computed tomography, though 3-dimensional imaging may optimize both modalities.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: