Why the study?
Does 3D MRI improve the evaluation of hip conditions compared to conventional 2D MRI?
Does 3D MRI improve the evaluation of hip conditions compared to conventional 2D MRI?
3D MRI of the hip provides superior visualization of labro-cartilaginous structures and better correlation with arthroscopy compared to conventional 2D MRI.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a common choice among various imaging modalities for the evaluation of hip conditions. Conventional MRI with two-dimensional acquisitions requires a significant amount of time and is limited by partial-volume artifacts and suboptimal fluid-to-cartilage contrast. Recent hardware and software advances have resulted in development of novel isotropic three-dimensional (3D) single-acquisition protocols that cover the volume of the entire hip and can be reconstructed in arbitrary planes for submillimeter assessment of bony and labro-cartilaginous structures in their planes of orientation. This technique facilitates superior identification of small labral tears and other hip lesions with better correlations with arthroscopy. In this review, we discuss technical details related to 3D MRI of the hip, its advantages, and its role in commonly encountered painful conditions that can be evaluated with great precision using this technology. The entities described are femoroacetabular impingement with acetabular labral tears, acetabular dysplasia, avascular necrosis, regional tendinopathies and tendon tears, bursitis, and other conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ashikyan et al. (2021) conducted a review in Hip conditions. 3D MRI vs. Conventional 2D MRI was evaluated.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: