Key result
Each 1-mm increase in lesion length during new device angioplasty was associated with an increased relative risk of target lesion revascularization at 1 year (RR 1.014; 95% CI 1.004-1.025).
Why the study?
Does longer lesion length increase the risk of adverse clinical outcomes, such as target lesion revascularization, in patients undergoing new device angioplasty of native coronary arteries?
Cohort (n=2,980)
Does longer lesion length increase the risk of adverse clinical outcomes, such as target lesion revascularization, in patients undergoing new device angioplasty of native coronary arteries?
Longer lesion length is associated with a higher risk of target lesion revascularization at 1 year following new device angioplasty.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May inform post-angioplasty TLR risk stratification; leaves open whether lesion length should guide device selection in prospective trials.
The influence of lesion length on early and late outcomes after new device angioplasty has not been well documented. We reviewed the clinical and angiographic outcomes of 2,980 patients (3,902 lesions) undergoing new device angioplasty of native vessels enrolled in the New Approaches to Coronary Interventions (NACI) Registry. Patients were divided into three groups according to the longest lesion length (< 10, 10-20, and > 20 mm) treated. Patients with the longest lesions had more multivessel disease (56.9% vs. 49.0%, P<0.05), right coronary artery disease (52.7% vs. 32.0%, P<0.001), and total occlusions (19.1% vs. 2.5%, P<0.001) than patients with shorter lesions. Longest lesions had the smallest minimal lumen diameter (P<0.001) at baseline and at the end of the procedure. Although in-hospital events were similar, there were differences in clinical outcomes at 1 year due mainly to more target lesion revascularization in the longest lesion group (P<0.01). Multivariate analysis showed that each 1-mm increase in lesion length was associated with an increase relative risk of 1.014 (95% CI, 1.004-1.025) for target lesion revascularization at 1 year. We conclude that despite similar early clinical events, patients undergoing new device angioplasty of longer lesions have more target lesion revascularization at 1 year.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saucedo et al. (2000) conducted a cohort in Native coronary artery disease (n=2,980). Lesion length vs. Shorter lesions was evaluated on Target lesion revascularization at 1 year (RR 1.014, 95% CI 1.004-1.025, p=<0.01). Each 1-mm increase in lesion length during new device angioplasty was associated with an increased relative risk of target lesion revascularization at 1 year (RR 1.014; 95% CI 1.004-1.025).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: