Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Formation experiments of CO 2 hydrate from the two-phase flow of liquid CO 2 and water were carried out using static mixers with different types of mixing elements to elucidate the effects of mixing functions of the static mixer on CO 2 hydrate formation. The mixing principle of the Kenics type static mixer is composed of three mixing functions, flow division, flow reversal, and radial mixing. In this study, three types of mixing elements in addition to the basic Kenics type static mixer were applied for CO 2 hydrate formation; each mixing element lacked at least one mixing function among three mixing functions. The observed behaviors of CO 2 hydrate formation could be classified into six patterns: (1) hydrate chunks, (2) CO 2 drops agglomerated through the hydrate film, (3) dispersed liquid CO 2 drops covered with hydrate film, (4) mixture of tiny liquid CO 2 drops and hydrate particles, (5) mixture of hydrate chunks and agglomerated CO 2 drops, and (6) mixture of agglomerated and dispersed CO 2 drops. Occurrences of the above patterns depended on the type of the mixing element as well as the flow rates of liquid CO 2 and water. From the observations, flow division was suggested to be important for the formation of hydrate chunks but not essential, and flow reversal was essential for the formation of dispersed hydrate particles. The formation mechanisms of CO 2 hydrate with the static mixer are discussed according to the results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tajima et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: