Key result
SARS coronavirus nucleocapsid (N) protein directly interacts and co-localizes with macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) protein in host cells, specifically involving amino acids 140-210.
Identifies MIF as a novel interaction partner of the SARS-CoV nucleocapsid protein, enhancing understanding of SARS replication mechanisms.
Hypothesis-generating for MIF as antiviral target; leaves open clinical relevance pending human validation.
The nucleocapsid (N) protein of SARS coronavirus (SARS-CoV) is a major structural component of virions, which appears to be a multifunctional protein involved in viral RNA replication and translation. However, how N protein interacts with host protein remains largely elusive. To identify cellular proteins that interact with the N protein and to elucidate the possible involvement of N protein in SARS-Cov replication and translation, a human lung cDNA library was screened using a yeast two-hybrid system assay. In this study, we have identified Macrophage migration inhibitory factor protein (MIF) as a novel interaction partner of N protein by yeast two-hybrid system. The direct interaction and co-localization of N protein with MIF were confirmed by immunoprecipitation and confocal microscopy analysis, respectively. The mapping studies localized the critical N sequences for this interaction to amino acid 140-210 including SR motif by yeast two-hybrid system. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report that SARS-N protein interacts with the MIF within host cells, which enhance our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of SARS replication.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lin et al. (2011) studied Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS). SARS nucleocapsid (N) protein was evaluated on Protein-protein interaction between SARS N protein and MIF. SARS coronavirus nucleocapsid (N) protein directly interacts and co-localizes with macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) protein in host cells, specifically involving amino acids 140-210.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: