Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We have probed one antiferromagnetic (AF) antiphase boundary (APB) and a single Fe(3)O(4) domain using nanogap contacts. Our experiments directly demonstrate that, in the case of probing one AF-APB, a large magnetoresistance (MR), high resistivity, and a high saturation field are observed as compared with the case of probing a single Fe(3)O(4) domain. The shape of the temperature-dependent MR curves is also found to differ between the single domain and one of the AF-APB measurements, with a characteristic strong temperature dependence for the single domain and temperature independence for the one AF-APB case. We argue that these observations are indicative of profound changes in the electronic transport across APBs. The investigated APB defects increase the activation energy and disturb the long-range charge ordering of monodomain Fe(3)O(4).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: