Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This study aimed to establish the frequency of oral mucosal conditions and xerostomia, identify a possible association between them, and verify their associated factors from a sample of the population of Três Corações, Brazil. A cross-sectional study was conducted with volunteers without age restriction. To evaluate the presence of oral mucosal conditions, an intra-oral examination was performed and a clinical diagnosis was established based on the official classifications of oral diseases. The report of xerostomia was identified by a validated questionnaire completed during anamnesis. Descriptive and association statistics were performed using a significance level of 5%. A total of 1,052 volunteers were evaluated. Oral mucosal lesions were observed in 42.11%, variations of normal structures in 38.50%, and xerostomia in 60.64%. Women were more affected than men, particularly women aged 20-49. Xerostomia was not found to be associated to oral mucosal conditions in general (p > 0.05); however, inflammatory fibrous hyperplasia (27.99%) and oral candidiasis (24.38%), the most prevalent lesions in the study, were associated with xerostomia (p < 0.001 and p = 0.006, respectively) and denture use (p = 0.025 and p < 0.001, respectively). Use of tobacco and alcohol intake were not associated with the presence of oral lesions (p = 0.319 and p = 0.739, respectively). The findings of this study are important for determining the prevalence of oral conditions and xerostomia in the general population, serving as a baseline for further investigations into the association between xerostomia, inflammatory fibrous hyperplasia, and oral candidiasis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Grossmann et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: