Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A glass chamber method of counting living microfilariae in 20–100 c.mm. samples of freshly haemolyzed blood proved to be substantially more sensitive than, and as reliable as, the use of standard wet or stained dry films. The method has the further advantages of simplicity and brevity. The results showed that with the “normal” thick smear technique between 30 and 40% of microfilariae are lost during processing of the slide. It is suggested that the chamber counting method has practical field and laboratory utility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Denham et al. (1971) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: