We conducted a progressive-drought greenhouse experiment, using potted paper birch (Betula papyrifera) seedlings in their third year of growth, to investigate whether a commercially available organic biostimulant improved plant health and stress tolerance, and to compare four noninvasive, instrument-based methods for monitoring plant stress. In the well-watered (no drought) plants, the biostimulant application significantly increased foliar nitrogen concentrations (P = 0.01) and led to marginally higher rates of photosynthesis (P = 0.10) and slightly higher Fv/Fmfluorescence ratios (P = 0.14). Reflectance indices further indicated that the biostimulant application resulted in increased chlorophyll content (Chl NDI, P = 0.07) and either (depending on interpretation) a significantly higher Chl:carotenoid ratio or a lower proportion of xanthophyll cycle pigments in the de-epoxidated state (PRI, P = 0.02). The PRI results suggest less oxidative stress in the treated plants, which may be related to the fact that the biostimulant used (Roots 3) contained ascorbate, an antioxidant. In the plants exposed to progressive drought, the biostimulant application had similar effects but did not appear to dramatically improve the drought stress tolerance of seedlings, in that impaired physiology occurred at about the same level of soil moisture in both treated and untreated seedlings. Photosynthesis responded to the drought treatment at about 12% to 15% soil moisture content (SMC), whereas PRI did not respond until about 9% to 10% SMC, and Fv/Fmdid not respond until about 4% to 5% SMC. Chl NDI did not show a significant response to SMC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Richardson et al. (2004) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: