Key result
Lifetime suicide attempts show no difference in resting-state functional connectivity versus self-directed violence thoughts alone.
Why the study?
Prior studies identifying altered brain structure and function in individuals at risk for self-directed violence largely utilized healthy controls, yielding inconsistent findings.
Observational (n=4,013)
Yes
p-value: p=>0.05
Resting-state functional network connectivity does not significantly differentiate individuals with a history of suicide attempts from those with self-directed violence thoughts alone in a large population-based sample.
Observed connectivity differences in suicide attempters versus ideators remain preliminary; leaves open replication and clinical risk prediction.
Background Prior research has identified altered brain structure and function in individuals at risk for self-directed violence thoughts and behaviors. However, these studies have largely utilized healthy controls and findings have been inconsistent. Thus, this study examined differences in resting-state functional network connectivity among individuals with lifetime suicide attempt(s) versus lifetime self-directed violence thoughts alone. Methods Using data from the UK Biobank, this study utilized a series of linear regressions to compare individuals with lifetime suicide attempt(s) ( n = 566) versus lifetime self-directed violence thoughts alone ( n = 3,447) on within- and between-network resting-state functional connectivity subnetworks. Results There were no significant between-group differences for between-network, within-network, or whole-brain functional connectivity after adjusting for age, sex, ethnicity, and body mass index and performing statistical corrections for multiple comparisons. Conclusions Resting-state network measures may not differentiate between individuals with lifetime suicide attempt(s) and lifetime self-directed violence thoughts alone. Null findings diverge from results reported in smaller neuroimaging studies of suicide risk, but are consistent with null findings in other large-scale studies and meta-analyses. Strengths of the study include its large sample size and stringent control group. Future research on a wider array of imaging, genetic, and psychosocial risk factors can clarify relative contributions of individual and combined variables to suicide risk and inform scientific understanding of ideation-to-action framework.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thompson et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Self-directed violence thoughts and suicide attempts (n=4,013). Lifetime suicide attempt(s) vs. Lifetime self-directed violence thoughts alone was evaluated on Resting-state functional network connectivity (within- and between-network) (p=>0.05). Resting-state functional network connectivity did not significantly differ between individuals with lifetime suicide attempts and those with self-directed violence thoughts alone.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: