This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
PURPOSE: To compare residual stromal bed thickness (RST) and regularity after manual layer-by-layer deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (M-DALK) and peeling-off deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (PO-DALK), after failed pneumatic dissection. METHODS: This retrospective case series included patients who underwent M-DALK or PO-DALK. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was assessed preoperatively and 1 month postoperatively. Anterior segment optical coherence tomography used to measure central and peripheral RST and Fourier analysis to assess asymmetry (ASY) were evaluated 1 month after surgery. RESULTS: BCVA varied significantly from baseline to 1 month after surgery in both groups (both P < 0.001). Mean central RST was 55.91 μm [95% confidence interval (CI) 51.87-59.95] in the PO-DALK group versus 56.32 μm (95% CI 51.08-61.56) in the M-DALK group (P = 1.0). Mean peripheral RST was 59.40 μm (95% CI 54.27-64.52) in PO-DALK versus 65.73 μm (95% CI 58.27-73.18) in M-DALK (P = 0.62). In both groups, the difference between mean central and peripheral RST was significant (P = 0.0001 in PO-DALK, P < 0.0001 in M-DALK). However, the mean difference between peripheral and central RST was 5.32 μm (95% CI 3.95-6.69) in PO-DALK versus 11.18 μm (95% CI 7.8-14.56) in M-DALK (P = 0.002) and difference among peripheral RSTs was 4.15 μm (95% CI 3.32-4.97) in PO-DALK versus 13.57 μm (95% CI 8.68-18.46) in M-DALK (P < 0.0004). ASY analysis of the 3-mm and 6-mm zones did not reveal significant differences among the 2 groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: PO-DALK provides a significantly more regular and homogeneous residual stromal bed than M-DALK. It is a simple and effective technique, offering a reliable alternative when pneumatic dissection fails.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rossi et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: