In order to analyze the correlation between immunohistochemical positivity for c-erbB-2 oncoprotein and prognosis in patients with malignant salivary gland tumors, 59 cases of malignant tumors of the major salivary glands, including 35 parotid gland, 20 submaxillary gland and 4 sublingual gland tumors, were studied immunohistochemically using a polyclonal antibody against c-erbB-2 oncoprotein. Positive staining was observed in 13 (22%) of the 59 cases. Interestingly, positive results were obtained only in adenocarcinoma (6/20) and carcinoma in pleomorphic adenoma (7/15), and not in any other histological types such as adenoid cystic carcinoma, mucoepidermoid tumor, and squamous cell carcinoma. There was no correlation between the degree of differentiation of adenocarcinoma and c-erbB-2 positivity. Since the carcinoma in pleomorphic adenoma positive for c-erbB-2 oncoprotein was adenocarcinoma, adenocarcinoma and adenocarcinoma in pleomorphic adenoma were placed together (n = 33), and the presence or absence of c-erbB-2 oncoprotein in this group was examined for correlation with patients' survival and other clinicopathological features, including clinical stage, tumor size, surgical margins, and lymph node status. The c-erbB-2-positive tumors tended to be more advanced and larger than negative tumors. Similarly, c-erbB-2-positive tumors were difficult to resect completely, were associated with lymph node metastasis more frequently, and showed lower disease-free survival than negative cases (P less than .05). We conclude that immunohistochemical positivity for c-erbB-2 is an indicator of aggressiveness in both adenocarcinoma and adenocarcinoma in pleomorphic adenoma of the major salivary glands.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sugano et al. (1992) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: