Key result
Short courses of OKT3 and ATG successfully treated steroid-resistant or recurrent acute rejection, though ATG showed a trend toward lower incidence of subsequent rejection (25% vs 69%, P=0.09).
Why the study?
Does a short course of OKT3 or ATG improve acute allograft cardiac rejection in heart transplant patients with steroid-resistant or recurrent rejection?
Observational (n=24)
Does a short course of OKT3 or ATG improve acute allograft cardiac rejection in heart transplant patients with steroid-resistant or recurrent rejection?
Absolute Event Rate: 69% vs 25%
p-value: p=0.09
Short 5-7 day courses of OKT3 or ATG are safe and effective for treating steroid-resistant or recurrent acute cardiac transplant rejection.
May support short OKT3/ATG for steroid-resistant cardiac rejection; leaves open comparative efficacy and requires randomized confirmation.
The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of short courses of OKT3 and ATG, respectively, for steroid resistant or recurrent acute allograft cardiac rejection (AR). Between June 1988 and March 1994, 101 heart transplant patients were treated with a quadruple sequential immunosuppression protocol (ATG, azathioprine, CsA, and prednisone). AR was diagnosed by endomyocardial biopsy (EMB), and patients with scores > 2 (ISHLT) received pulse methylprednisolone, 500 mg i.v. on 3 consecutive days. In cases of steroid-resistant or recurrent AR, OKT3 (5 mg/d) or ATG (1.5-2.5 mg/kg/d), was administered for 5-7 d instead of the usual 10-14 d course. OKT3 (17 courses; 10 steroid resistant, 7 recurrent AR; 5.3 +/- 0.7 doses) was given to 16 patients (4F/12M, 45 +/- 11 yr), 29-269 d after transplantation. ATG (8 courses; 5 steroid resistant, 3 recurrent AR; 4.9 +/- 0.6 doses) was given to 8 patients (1F/7M, 53 +/- 7 yr), 23-503 d after transplantation. Successful treatment of AR with a score < 2 at the first and second EMB after treatment was 88% and 88% with OKT3, and 87.5% and 100% with ATG, respectively. Throughout follow-up (50 +/- 22 months after OKT3; 49 +/- 28 months after ATG), there was a trend towards lower incidence of subsequent AR after ATG (25% vs. 69%, P = 0.09), and similar incidence of infections, graft atherosclerosis and mortality. No cases of lymphoproliferative disorder were observed. We conclude that short courses of OKT3 or ATG are safe and effective for the treatment of steroid resistant or recurrent AR, with a similar incidence of complications. These results may have cost-effectiveness implications and need to be confirmed in a randomized study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cantarovich et al. (1997) conducted an observational in Steroid-resistant or recurrent acute allograft cardiac rejection (n=24). Short course of OKT3 vs. Short course of ATG was evaluated on Incidence of subsequent acute rejection (p=0.09). Short courses of OKT3 and ATG successfully treated steroid-resistant or recurrent acute rejection, though ATG showed a trend toward lower incidence of subsequent rejection (25% vs 69%, P=0.09).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: