Key result
Natalizumab is linked to a median annual relapse rate of 0 in highly active multiple sclerosis.
Why the study?
NTZ is approved and reimbursed in Russia for highly active relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis, but data regarding its treatment and the effect of federal reimbursement were lacking.
Does natalizumab improve clinical and MRI outcomes in patients with highly active relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis in routine clinical practice?
Observational (n=334)
Yes
Does natalizumab improve clinical and MRI outcomes in patients with highly active relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis in routine clinical practice?
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 2%
p-value: p=<0.0001
Natalizumab demonstrates high efficacy in real-world Russian clinical practice for multiple sclerosis, though risk management plan implementation remains suboptimal.
May support natalizumab in highly active MS; extends real-world data but leaves open risk management optimization.
BACKGROUND: NTZ is approved in Russia for the treatment of highly active relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis and is reimbursed via federal budget program. However, no data about NTZ treatment in Russia and the effect of federal reimbursement have been performed so far. OBJECTIVE: To characterize the population of patients receiving natalizumab and assess the efficacy and risk-management plan (RMP) implementation of NTZ therapy in routine clinical practice in Russia. METHODS: We analyzed data for 334 patients, who received at least one infusion of NTZ. Relapse rate, MRI activity, NEDA-3 status after 2 years were assessed. Anti-JC virus antibodies status and RMP implementation were evaluated. Drop-out rate and reasons for therapy discontinuation were analyzed. RESULTS: Patients switched to natalizumab in Russia are mainly female (63%), with median EDSS score of 3.5 and high disease activity: 93% had at least 1 relapse and 58% had both T1Gd+ and new T2 lesion a year before therapy initiation. Introduction of federal reimbursement allowed patients with less relapses to start therapy with natalizumab. The only predictor of 6-month progression was EDSS score at the baseline of therapy (HR = 2.1375, 95%CI 1.0026-4.5570, p = 0.0492). 82% patients reached NEDA-3 at 24 month of therapy. 25% of patients discontinued NTZ for reasons: tolerability (14.5%), JCV antibody status (61%), and patient's decision (17%). RMP was implemented in only 36% patients. CONCLUSION: Natalizumab appeared to have high efficacy in Russian clinical practice. Federal reimbursement allowed less active patients to start natalizumab. More efforts should be done to improve RMP implementation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Evdoshenko et al. (2019) conducted an observational in Multiple sclerosis (n=334). Natalizumab vs. Baseline (12 months prior to therapy) was evaluated on Annual relapse rate at 12 months (p=<0.0001). Natalizumab significantly reduced the median annual relapse rate from 2 to 0 compared to the year prior to therapy in patients with highly active multiple sclerosis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: