Key result
3D-CRT in breast cancer is not associated with differences in CACS compared to controls.
Why the study?
Does three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy increase coronary artery calcium score in breast cancer patients compared to women without breast cancer?
Case-Control (n=100)
Does three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy increase coronary artery calcium score in breast cancer patients compared to women without breast cancer?
Coronary artery calcium scoring may not be an appropriate screening test to detect early radiation-induced coronary artery disease in breast cancer patients treated with 3D-CRT.
No CACS difference after 3D-CRT; leaves open whether calcium scoring screens radiation-induced CAD or non-calcified plaques predominate.
Background: Adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) improves the prognosis of breast cancer (BC); nevertheless, causes post-RT complications. One of the most life-threatening complications of RT in BC patients is atherosclerotic coronary artery disease (CAD). Compared with old two-dimensional RT (2D-RT), newer three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) protects normal tissues including the heart from irradiation. Early detection of plaques using coronary artery calcium score (CACS) could improve the post-RT BC survivors’ outcomes. Objectives: This study assessed CACS in BC patients who underwent 3D-CRT to find whether there is any significant difference between their CACS and those of non-BC patients. Patients and Methods: CACS of fifty BC patients with different intervals from RT - case - and fifty women with no history of BC or RT - control - using 64-slice ECG-gated CT scan were assessed as Agatston score (AS). The risk factors of CAD, the Framingham’s 10-year risk score, and the age-matched CACS percentiles were evaluated. Results: No AS difference between the case and control was found. No correlation between AS and RT-to-follow-up time interval, laterality of BC, Framingham’s 10-year risk score or traditional CAD risk factors were detected. Increase in CACS related to the senile atherosclerotic process was shown (P < 0.001). Conclusion: No significant difference in CACS was found in BC patients treated by 3D-CRT in comparison with those of non-BC individuals or BC patients who treated by 2D-RT. This finding may be the result of either the non-calcified nature of radiation-induced CAD plaques or reduced cardiac radiation in 3D-CRT, leading to myocardial microvascular disease rather than senile calcified atherosclerotic plaques. CACS may not be an appropriate screening test to detect early CAD in these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shabestari et al. (2018) conducted a case-control in Breast cancer post-radiotherapy (n=100). Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) vs. No history of breast cancer or radiotherapy was evaluated on Coronary artery calcium score (Agatston score). Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in breast cancer patients was not associated with a significant difference in coronary artery calcium score compared to women without breast cancer.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: