Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper studies the long-existing idea of adding a nice smooth function to “smooth” a nondifferentiable objective function in the context of sparse optimization, in particular, the minimization of \|x\|₁+1/2α\|x\|₂², where x is a vector, as well as the minimization of \|X\|_*+1/2α\|X\|F², where X is a matrix and \|X\|_* and \|X\|F are the nuclear and Frobenius norms of X, respectively. We show that they let sparse vectors and low-rank matrices be efficiently recovered. In particular, they enjoy exact and stable recovery guarantees similar to those known for the minimization of \|x\|₁ and \|X\|_* under the conditions on the sensing operator such as its null-space property, restricted isometry property (RIP), spherical section property, or “RIPless” property. To recover a (nearly) sparse vector x⁰, minimizing \|x\|₁+1/2α\|x\|²₂ returns (nearly) the same solution as minimizing \|x\|₁ whenever α≥ 10\|x⁰\|_∞. The same relation also holds between minimizing \|X\|_*+1/2α\|X\|F² and minimizing \|X\|_* for recovering a (nearly) low-rank matrix X⁰ if α≥ 10\|X⁰\|₂. Furthermore, we show that the linearized Bregman algorithm, as well as its two fast variants, for minimizing \|x\|₁+1/2α\|x\|₂² subject to Ax=b enjoys global linear convergence as long as a nonzero solution exists, and we give an explicit rate of convergence. The convergence property does not require a sparse solution or any properties on A. To the best of our knowledge, this is the best known global convergence result for first-order sparse optimization algorithms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lai et al. (2013) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: