Key result
Hsp70-FMDV peptide complexes enhance bovine memory CD4+ T cell proliferation versus peptide alone in vitro.
p-value: p=<0.001
Hsp70 enhances the presentation of FMDV antigen to bovine CD4+ T cells in vitro, providing evidence for its potential use as an antigen delivery vehicle in livestock vaccines.
May support Hsp70 as an FMDV antigen carrier in cattle vaccines; leaves open in vivo efficacy and field translation.
Foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) is the causative agent of a highly contagious acute vesicular disease affecting cloven-hoofed animals, including cattle, sheep and pigs. The current vaccine induces a rapid humoral response, but the duration of the protective antibody response is variable, possibly associated with a variable specific CD4+ T cell response. We investigated the use of heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70) as a molecular chaperone to target viral antigen to the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) class II pathway of antigen presenting cells and generate enhanced MHC II-restricted CD4+ T cell responses in cattle. Monocytes and CD4+ T cells from FMDV vaccinated cattle were stimulated in vitro with complexes of Hsp70 and FMDV peptide, or peptide alone. Hsp70 was found to consistently improve the presentation of a 25-mer FMDV peptide to CD4+ T cells, as measured by T cell proliferation. Complex formation was required for the enhanced effects and Hsp70 alone did not stimulate proliferation. This study provides further evidence that Hsp70:peptide complexes can enhance antigen-specific CD4+ T cell responses in vitro for an important pathogen of livestock.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McLaughlin et al. (2010) studied Foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV) immunity (n=8). Hsp70 complexed with FMDV peptide (BC2) vs. FMDV peptide (BC2) alone was evaluated on CD4+ T cell proliferation (p=<0.001). Hsp70 complexed with FMDV peptide significantly enhanced the proliferation of bovine memory CD4+ T cells compared to peptide alone in vitro.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: