Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
When discretizing continuous-time filters, one is often interested in preserving a property termed covariance-invariance. Techniques are outlined for synthesizing discrete-time filters which are covariance-invariant with corresponding continuous-time filters. The synthesis techniques involve straightforward matrix decompositions or polynomial root-finding algorithms that can easily be programmed on a digital computer. Applications of the technique to digital filter synthesis are outlined, with example designs presented for covariance-invariant Butterworth and Chebyshev digital filters. Based on the frequency response of these designs it is argued that the method of covariance-invariance is superior to the methods of impulse-invariance and bilinear-z as a response matching design technique for the synthesis of digital filters. This superiority is especially apparent at sampling rates that are marginal with respect to filter critical frequencies. Moreover, the covariance-invariant designs are stably invertible solutions to a so-called spectral factorization problem. This property may be important in inverse filtering applications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Perl et al. (1977) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: