Key result
Field-based roller-skiing tests show ~2% lower heart rate at 2 mmol/L lactate vs lab tests.
Why the study?
To identify differences in heart rate and blood lactate concentration relationships between laboratory- and field-based skate-roller-skiing tests.
Does field-based testing compared to laboratory-based testing alter the heart rate-blood lactate relationship in world-class biathletes?
Cohort (n=14)
No
Does field-based testing compared to laboratory-based testing alter the heart rate-blood lactate relationship in world-class biathletes?
Mean Difference: 1.9 (95% CI -4.5–8.3)
p-value: p=<.001
For a given heart rate, blood lactate concentration is greater in field-based compared to laboratory-based roller skiing, which may impact how training-intensity zones are defined.
Field-based testing may shift lactate thresholds versus lab in biathletes; leaves open whether intensity zones require modality-specific calibration.
PURPOSE: To identify differences in heart rate (HR) and concentration of blood lactate ([La]) relationships between laboratory- and field-based skate-roller-skiing tests. METHODS: Fourteen world-class biathletes (8 women, 6 men) completed a laboratory- and field-based roller-skiing test using the skate technique. The laboratory-based test comprised 5 to 7 submaximal steps at a fixed incline and speed on a roller-skiing treadmill. The field-based test comprised 5 steps on a course where the final hill was designed to mimic the conditions of the laboratory test. HR and [La] were measured for each step. The HR associated with 2 mmol·L-1 (HR@2 mmol) and 4 mmol·L-1 (HR@4 mmol) of [La] was calculated using an interpolation method. A 1-way analysis of variance and Bland-Altman analyses with 95% limits of agreement (LoA) were used to determine if test type influenced HR@2 mmol or HR@4 mmol. A second-order polynomial was fitted to group-level data to highlight the HR-[La] relationships for laboratory- and field-based tests. RESULTS: HR@2 mmol was lower for field tests than for laboratory tests (mean bias: 1.9%HRmax; 95% LoA: -4.5 to +8.3%HRmax; P < .001). HR@4 mmol was also lower for field tests compared to laboratory tests (mean bias: 2.4%HRmax; 95% LoA: -1.2 to +6.0%HRmax; P < .001). On the group level, the lactate threshold occurred at a lower HR during roller skiing in the field compared to the laboratory. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this study confirm that for a given HR, [La] was greater in field- compared with laboratory-based conditions. These results might have implications for how coaches define training-intensity "zones" during skate roller skiing based on laboratory tests.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Staunton et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Healthy (World-class biathletes) (n=14). Field-based skate-roller-skiing test vs. Laboratory-based skate-roller-skiing test was evaluated on Heart rate associated with 2 mmol·L−1 of blood lactate (HR@2 mmol) (mean bias 1.9%HRmax, 95% CI -4.5 to +8.3, p=<.001). Field-based roller-skiing tests resulted in a significantly lower heart rate at 2 mmol·L−1 blood lactate concentration (mean bias 1.9%HRmax) compared to laboratory-based tests.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: