Why the study?
Does heart displacement using moist laparotomy pads cause more haemodynamic derangement than deep pericardial traction sutures in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery?
Does heart displacement using moist laparotomy pads cause more haemodynamic derangement than deep pericardial traction sutures in patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery?
Displacement of the heart using moist laparotomy pads causes significant haemodynamic derangement compared to deep pericardial traction sutures during off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery.
Pads for heart displacement linked to greater hemodynamic changes than traction sutures; leaves open optimal technique in off-pump CABG pending randomized data.
Haemodynamic changes occurring during heart displacement, using moist laparotomy pads placed behind the heart (PAD group, n = 26) or deep pericardial traction sutures (DPS group, n = 25) to facilitate exposure of the left anterior descending artery during off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery, were compared. Haemodynamic variables were assessed before and 10 min after displacement of the heart. The central venous pressure, mean pulmonary artery pressure and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure increased in both groups. After heart displacement in the PAD group, the cardiac index, stroke volume index, mixed venous oxygen saturation, right ventricular ejection fraction and left ventricular stroke work index decreased significantly, and the systemic vascular resistance and pulmonary vascular resistance increased significantly; these parameters remained unchanged in the DPS group. It was concluded that displacement of the heart using moist laparotomy pads caused significant haemodynamic derangement compared with that caused by deep pericardial traction sutures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kim et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: