Key result
Good early INR control on warfarin predicts ~4-fold greater odds of good control in months 7-12.
Why the study?
Does good initial time in therapeutic range (TTR) predict long-term stability of warfarin control in adults with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Cohort
Does good initial time in therapeutic range (TTR) predict long-term stability of warfarin control in adults with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
In patients with NVAF on warfarin, good INR control in the first 6 months strongly predicts continued good control over the subsequent year, suggesting warfarin remains a reliable option for patients who demonstrate early adherence and stability.
OBJECTIVES: Whether warfarin-treated patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) who exhibit good control will experience deterioration in control over time is uncertain. We designed this study to examine the time in therapeutic range (TTR) in a population-based cohort of patients with NVAF recently initiated on warfarin. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using routinely collected health data from 2008 to 2015. SETTING: The Canadian province of Alberta. PARTICIPANTS: All adults with NVAF who were taking warfarin for >1 month. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Frequency of international normalised ratio (INR) monitoring and the Rosendaal TTR with time zero set at 31 days after the first warfarin dispensation. RESULTS: 65%); good control continued to be exhibited by 8177 (57.1% of those who remained on warfarin) during months 7-12 and 6804 (56.8% of continuing warfarin users) in months 13-18. Good control in the first 6 months predicted good control over the subsequent year: adjusted OR (aOR) 4.0(95%CI 3.8 to 4.2), c index 0.685(95%CI 0.679 to 0.691) for months 7-12 and aOR 3.2(95%CI 3.1 to 3.3), c index 0.665(95%CI 0.659 to 0.671) for months 13-18. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly one-third of warfarin-treated patients had insufficient INR monitoring-this could influence the initial choice of anticoagulant and identifies a target for future quality improvement efforts. Of those warfarin-treated patients who went for regular INR monitoring, 41% exhibited levels of control similar to that in randomised trials and this deteriorated by half over time. However, in patients who have already exhibited adherence with regular monitoring and good TTR, warfarin may still be a reliable anticoagulation option.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
McAlister et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Good INR control in the first 6 months was evaluated on Good INR control during months 7-12 (aOR 4.0, 95% CI 3.8 to 4.2). Good INR control in the first 6 months of warfarin therapy strongly predicted good control during months 7-12 (aOR 4.0; 95% CI 3.8 to 4.2).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: