Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Randomized double-blind trial demonstrates safety and efficacy of subthalamic deep brain stimulation in isolated dystonia, indicating an effective alternative to pallidal stimulation.
BACKGROUND: The safety and effectiveness of deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN-DBS) for the treatment of dystonia lack high-level evidence-based medical support. This study aimed to clarify the efficacy and safety of STN-DBS and perform a post hoc analysis comparing it with DBS of the internal globus pallidus (GPi-DBS). METHODS: This multicentre, randomised, double-blind, controlled trial included 67 patients aged 6-60 years old diagnosed with genetic or idiopathic isolated generalised or segmental dystonia. They were enrolled from seven hospitals in China and randomly assigned to undergo GPi-DBS or STN-DBS. After surgery, they were randomised to receive either neurostimulation or sham stimulation for 3 months. At the 3-month follow-up, neurostimulation was also initiated in the sham stimulation group, and all patients were followed up for more than 3 years after treatment. The primary outcome was the Burke-Fahn-Marsden Dystonia Rating Scale movement (BFMDRS-M) score. There were no ongoing serious adverse events throughout the study. CONCLUSIONS: For isolated generalised and segmental dystonia patients, the STN is a selectable DBS target with ensured safety and efficacy. STN-DBS and GPi-DBS may achieve comparable therapeutic effects on motor symptoms. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03017586.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: